Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600KF is 478 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600KF
- Performs up to 7% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i5-10400F - 125 vs 117 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i5-9600KF - €91.6 vs €389.95
- Up to 75% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i5-9600KF - €0.78 vs €3.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 12 vs 6 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
125
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.12/FPS
25%
Price, €
€389.95
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for €389.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12131 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
117
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.78/FPS
100%
Price, €
€91.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €91.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12131 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |