Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 1632 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-4150 - 249 vs 226 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i5-9600K - €78.99 vs €209.12
- Up to 58% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i5-9600K - €0.35 vs €0.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600K - 54 vs 95 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
249
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
41%
Price, €
€209.12
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for €209.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
226
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €78.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600K | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |