Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 2237 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 15% better in No Man's Sky than Core i3-3220 - 182 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i5-9600K - €25.06 vs €209.12
- Up to 86% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i5-9600K - €0.16 vs €1.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600K - 55 vs 95 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.15/FPS
13%
Price, €
€209.12
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €209.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
158
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.06
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €25.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600K | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |