Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9500 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9500 is 435 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9500
- Performs up to 0% better in Control than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 202 vs 201 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i5-9500 - €102.0 vs €214.93
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9500 - 24 vs 6 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €214.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74382 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
201
99.5049504950495%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€102
100%
Buy for €102 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74382 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
79.97275204359673%
Multi-Core
6976
100%
Intel Core i5-9500 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |