Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1465 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €151.36 vs €697.38
- Up to 68% better value when playing New World than Core i9-13900KS - €1.33 vs €4.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 46% better in New World than Core i5-9400F - 167 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 32 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
114
68%
Value, €/FPS
€1.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€151.36
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €151.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12725 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.18/FPS
31%
Price, €
€697.38
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €697.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12724 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |