Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700KF and the cheaper Core i5-9400F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i7-9700KF - €148.13 vs €383.39
- Up to 59% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-9700KF - €1.4 vs €3.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-9400F - 112 vs 106 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 8 vs 6 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
106
94%
Value, €/FPS
€1.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€148.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €148.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
112
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.42/FPS
40%
Price, €
€383.39
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €383.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i7-9700KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |