Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 1457 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i5-13400 - €148.19 vs €228.23
- Up to 29% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-13400 - €0.79 vs €1.11 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-9400F - 206 vs 187 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
187
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.79/FPS
100%
Price, €
€148.19
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €148.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
Buy for €228.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i5-13400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |