Buy on Amazon
€148.32
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $132
Availability
MSRP in USD: $132
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2268 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-6300 - 187 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - €49.68 vs €148.32
- Up to 62% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-9400F - €0.3 vs €0.79 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Intel BX80684I59400F CORE I5-9400F 2.90GHZ SKT1151 9MB CACHE BOXED :: (Komponenten> Prozessoren CPU)
Buy for €148.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 476 minutes ago
LANCHY AMD FX-Serie FX-6300 CPU verwendet 6-Core 6-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 3,5 GHz 8M 95W Sockel AM3+
Buy for €49.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 692 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i5-9400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 6 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
