Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8600T outperforms Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8600T is 2037 days newer than Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600T
- Performs up to 9% better in Remnant II than Core i3-3240 - 86 vs 79 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8600T doesn't have integrated graphics
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-8600T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Core i3-3240
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3240
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
44.00317712470214%
Multi-Core
1137
24.38867438867439%
Intel Core i5-8600T | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
