Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8600K outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8600K is 776 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600K
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Athlon 3000G - 202 vs 200 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i5-8600K - €69.0 vs €242.73
- Up to 72% better value when playing Control than Core i5-8600K - €0.34 vs €1.2 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-8600K - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €242.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
Buy for €69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8600K | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Athlon |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |