Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Core i5-8400T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1373 days newer than Core i5-8400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400T
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 7% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-8400T - 116 vs 108 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400T doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
116
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €69.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7424 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8400T | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |