Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i5-8400T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 184 days newer than Core i5-8400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400T
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 1% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-8400T - 134 vs 133 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400T - 24 vs 6 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€309.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €309.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6953 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
1099
86.26373626373626%
Multi-Core
3884
52.10625167695198%
Intel Core i5-8400T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |