Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1925 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €177.5 vs €675.29
- Up to 65% better value when playing Grand Theft Auto V than Core i9-13900KS - €1.39 vs €3.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 33% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Core i5-8400 - 170 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 32 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
128
75%
Value, €/FPS
€1.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€177.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €177.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
170
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.97/FPS
35%
Price, €
€675.29
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for €675.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8400 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |