Buy on Amazon
€177.5
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 1985 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 18% better in Rust than Core i7-3770S - 193 vs 163 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i5-8400 - €113.29 vs €177.5
- Up to 24% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-8400 - €0.7 vs €0.92 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel Core i5-8400 Prozessor (9 MB Cache, bis zu 4,00 GHz)
Buy for €177.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
Core i7-3770S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
163
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.7/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.29
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-3770S CPU Verwendeter 4-Core 8-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 3,1 GHz 8M 65W LGA1155
Buy for €113.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-8400
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Core i7-3770S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8400 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770S |
|---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
| 6 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
