Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8279U outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8279U is 2312 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8279U
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G1620 - 201 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 28 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i5-8279U
Mobile • Apr 3rd, 2019
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8279U | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel BGA 1526 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
28 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Iris Pro Plus 655 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
