Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8279U outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8279U is 580 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8279U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 28 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8279U - 16 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
239
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€329
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €329 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 3rd, 2019
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8279U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1526 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
28 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Iris Pro Plus 655 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |