Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7640X outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7640X is 1707 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7640X
- Performs up to 9% better in Valheim than FX-8350 - 207 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 112 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i5-7640X - €155.88 vs €199.0
- Up to 15% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-7640X - €0.82 vs €0.96 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7640X - 8 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
Buy for €155.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7640X | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
112 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |