Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 1827 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7600.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - €117.05 vs €153.76
- Up to 9% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-12400F - €0.21 vs €0.23 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 19% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-7600 - 659 vs 554 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600 - 12 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
554
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€117.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €117.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
659
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
91%
Price, €
€153.76
76%
FPS Winner
Buy for €153.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7600 | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |