Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-7600 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-7600 is 240 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600
- Performs up to 10% better in The Callisto Protocol than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 114 vs 104 FPS
- Up to 37% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €113.81 vs €181.05
- Up to 43% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €1.0 vs €1.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600 - 16 vs 4 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
114
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.81
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €113.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
104
91%
Value, €/FPS
€1.74/FPS
57%
Price, €
€181.05
62%
Buy for €181.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7600 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |