Buy on Amazon
€368.15
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 3894 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 67% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i5-760 - 120 vs 72 FPS
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i5-760 - €101.47 vs €368.15
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i5-760 Prozessor 2,8 GHz 8 MB Cache Sockel LGA1156
Buy for €368.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75135 minutes ago
Intel Core i3-10105 10. Generation Desktop Prozessor (Basistakt: 3.7GHz Tuboboost: 4.4GHz, 4 Kerne, LGA1200) BX8070110105
Buy for €101.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75135 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-760
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Core i3-10105
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-760
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Single-Core
457
30.73301950235373%
Multi-Core
1280
27.771750922108918%
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
