Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Core i5-7500T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 70 days older than Core i5-7500T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 35 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 6% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-7500T - 182 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 44 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i5-7500T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-7500T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1110
94.46808510638299%
Multi-Core
3076
31.978376130574905%
Intel Core i5-7500T | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Broadwell |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 22 |
| 4 | Threads | 44 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 145 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
