Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Core i5-7300HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 1281 days newer than Core i5-7300HQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7300HQ
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 45 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield IV than Core i5-7300HQ - 430 vs 400 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7300HQ - 24 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
430
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€579.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €579.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10462 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7300HQ | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |