Key Differences
In short — Core i5-661 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-661 is 1061 days older than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-661
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G1610 - 191 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than Intel Core i5-661 - 55 vs 87 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i5-661
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
87.29508196721312%
Multi-Core
739
79.54790096878364%
Intel Core i5-661 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Clarkdale | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 87 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
