Buy on Amazon
€128.16
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $213
Availability
MSRP in USD: $213
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $399
Availability
MSRP in USD: $399
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600T outperforms Ryzen 7 1700X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600T is 609 days older than Ryzen 7 1700X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600T
- Performs up to 1% better in Ready or Not than Ryzen 7 1700X - 259 vs 256 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1700X - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600T - 16 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen 7 1700X
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
256
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€128.16
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 1700x Prozessor 3,4 GHz 16 MB L3
Buy for €128.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i5-6600T
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Ryzen 7 1700X
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600T | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700X |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Skylake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Core i5-6600T or Ryzen 7 1700X
Ready or Not, 1920 x 1080, Epic
58 FPS
€12.05/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Ryzen 7 1700X
32 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€699
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
