Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-6600K outperforms the more expensive Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-6600K is 551 days older than the more expensive Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-7100 - 415 vs 407 FPS
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i3-7100 - €45.0 vs €128.17
- Up to 65% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i3-7100 - €0.11 vs €0.31 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 51 vs 91 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
415
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13116 minutes ago
Buy for €128.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13116 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600K | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
91 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |