Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600K outperforms FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600K is 982 days newer than FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 16% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-8320 - 175 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 91 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600K - 8 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
175
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€99.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €99.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 221 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600K | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |