Buy on Amazon
€52.03
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6500 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6500 is 551 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6500
- Performs up to 44% better in FIFA 23 than Celeron G3930T - 144 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i5-6500 - €20.54 vs €52.03
- Up to 42% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i5-6500 - €0.21 vs €0.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-6500 - 35 vs 65 Watts
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Prozessor Core i5-6500, 3,2 GHz (Turbo Boost 3,6 GHz), 4 Kerne, 6 MB Cache Socket 1151 (überholt)
Buy for €52.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
100
69%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.54
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3930T 2,7 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread 35 W CPU-Prozessor LGA 1151
Buy for €20.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-6500
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6500 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
