Buy on Amazon
€84.81
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $182
Availability
MSRP in USD: $182
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6400 is 941 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Performs up to 87% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Celeron G1620 - 84 vs 45 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i5-6400 - €20.16 vs €84.81
- Up to 55% better value when playing Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i5-6400 - €0.45 vs €1.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-6400 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Intel Core i5-6400 2,7GHz Boxed CPU
Buy for €84.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
45
53%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Verwendeter 2-Kern-2-Thread-Desktop-Prozessor 2,7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 403 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i5-6400
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6400 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
