Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 2153 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Up to 66% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - €89.07 vs €261.39
- Up to 62% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen 3 3300X - €1.59 vs €4.22 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 11% better in Starfield than Core i5-4690K - 62 vs 56 FPS
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690K - 65 vs 88 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690K - 8 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
56
90%
Value, €/FPS
€1.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.07
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €89.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
Buy for €261.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4690K | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
88 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |