Buy on Amazon
€51.13
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4690 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4690 is 978 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Performs up to 11% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron G3930T - 229 vs 207 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-4690 - €20.54 vs €51.13
- Up to 55% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i5-4690 - €0.1 vs €0.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690 - 35 vs 84 Watts
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Intel i5-4690 Core Prozessor (3,5 GHz, Sockel 1150, 6M Cache, 84 Watt)
Buy for €51.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18375 minutes ago
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
207
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.54
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3930T 2,7 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread 35 W CPU-Prozessor LGA 1151
Buy for €20.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18374 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Core i5-4690
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4690 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
| May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 84 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
