Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 3170 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen 7 7800X3D - €51.13 vs €387.99
- Up to 79% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 7 7800X3D - €0.15 vs €0.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 84 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 64% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-4690 - 550 vs 335 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 16 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
335
60%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €51.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13181 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
550
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
21%
Price, €
€387.99
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for €387.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13180 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4690 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | No |