Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3511 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670T
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €288.0 vs €675.29
- Up to 50% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-13900KS - €1.45 vs €2.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 45 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 18% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-4670T - 234 vs 198 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670T - 32 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €288 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
234
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.89/FPS
50%
Price, €
€675.29
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for €675.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 279 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670T | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 150 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |