Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 2599 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670T
- Up to 76% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - €288.0 vs €1222.9
- Up to 75% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - €1.61 vs €6.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 45 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-4670T - 192 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670T - 32 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €288 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
192
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.37/FPS
25%
Price, €
€1222.9
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,222.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |