Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i5-4670T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 1782 days newer than Core i5-4670T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-4670T - 181 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670T - 12 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i5-4670T
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Ryzen 5 2600
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-4670T
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
989
85.85069444444444%
Multi-Core
2614
53.99710803552985%
Intel Core i5-4670T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
