Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3511 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €62.24 vs €690.13
- Up to 89% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-13900KS - €0.53 vs €4.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 19% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-4670S - 141 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670S - 32 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
118
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€62.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €62.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7440 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
141
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.89/FPS
10%
Price, €
€690.13
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for €690.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7439 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670S | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 150 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |