Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4590 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4590 is 514 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4590
- Performs up to 11% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G1610 - 126 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i5-4590 - 55 vs 84 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-4590
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4590 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 84 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
