Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7640X outperforms Core i5-450M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-7640X is 2465 days newer than Core i5-450M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-450M
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Core i5-7640X - 35 vs 112 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7640X
- Performs up to 22% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-450M - 138 vs 113 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
138
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€199
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12075 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-450M | vs | Intel Core i5-7640X |
---|---|---|
Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Arrandale | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 112 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |