Buy on Amazon
€230.33
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Core i5-4460T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2572 days newer than Core i5-4460T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 6% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i5-4460T - 268 vs 252 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460T - 12 vs 4 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Intel® Core™ i5-11600K Desktop Prozessor 6 Kerne bis zu 4,9 GHz entsperrt LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipsatz) 125W
Buy for €230.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i5-4460T
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
Core i5-11600K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-4460T
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
Single-Core
802
36.68801463860933%
Multi-Core
2190
25.52745075183588%
Intel Core i5-4460T | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Core i5-4460T or Core i5-11600K
Monster Hunter: World, 1920 x 1080, Highest
134 FPS
€8.77/FPS
Radeon RX 6750 XT
Core i5-11600K
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€1,174.9
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
