Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Core i5-4460 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 898 days newer than Core i5-4460.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 84 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 4% better in Starfield than Core i5-4460 - 55 vs 53 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460 - 44 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-4460
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-4460
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Single-Core
1051
89.44680851063829%
Multi-Core
2928
30.439754652250755%
Intel Core i5-4460 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Broadwell |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 22 |
| 4 | Threads | 44 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 145 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
