Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-4460 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2501 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-4460.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 13% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-4460 - 188 vs 166 FPS
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i5-4460 - €101.9 vs €319.0
- Up to 72% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-4460 - €0.54 vs €1.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4460 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460 - 12 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €319 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3564 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
188
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€101.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €101.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3565 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4460 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |