Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4440 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4440 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 2753 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4440.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4440
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - €59.04 vs €258.59
- Up to 75% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i9-11900F - €0.34 vs €1.37 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 9% better in Deathloop than Core i5-4440 - 189 vs 173 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4440 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4440 - 16 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
173
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€59.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €59.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13050 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
189
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.37/FPS
24%
Price, €
€258.59
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €258.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13049 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4440 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |