Buy on Amazon
€74.04
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms Core i5-4300M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2753 days newer than Core i5-4300M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4300M
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 37 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 7% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-4300M - 132 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4300M - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-10105F 10. Generation Desktop Prozessor (Basistakt: 3.7GHz Tuboboost: 4.4GHz, 4 Kerne, LGA1200) BX8070110105F
Buy for €74.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-4300M
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4300M | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 5000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
