Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3570 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3570 is 185 days older than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570
- Performs up to 3% better in Remnant II than Celeron G1610 - 80 vs 78 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i5-3570 - 55 vs 77 Watts
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3570
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
64.9390243902439%
Multi-Core
739
38.409563409563404%
Intel Core i5-3570 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 77 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
