Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3475S outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3475S is 332 days older than FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3475S
- Performs up to 3% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-6350 - 111 vs 108 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3475S - 6 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i5-3475S
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3475S | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
