Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms Core i5-3470T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3210 days newer than Core i5-3470T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 9% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-3470T - 163 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470T - 12 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
163
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
100%
Price, €
€118.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €118.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
565
28.811830698623154%
Multi-Core
1135
14.91850683491062%
Intel Core i5-3470T | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |