Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3470T outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3470T is 185 days older than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470T
- Performs up to 3% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G1610 - 154 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3470T
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3470T | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
