Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Core i5-3470T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 2958 days newer than Core i5-3470T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470T
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 15% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-3470T - 137 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470T - 24 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3470T
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3470T
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
565
32.67784846732215%
Multi-Core
1135
11.3160518444666%
Intel Core i5-3470T | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
