Buy on Amazon
€65.01
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6300 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-6300 is 1187 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470S
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i3-6300 - €65.01 vs €119.88
- Up to 42% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i3-6300 - €0.58 vs €1.0 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Performs up to 7% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-3470S - 120 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-3470S - 51 vs 65 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-3470S
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
112
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€65.01
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-3470S Prozessor (2,9GHz, Sockel 1155, 6MB Cache, 65 Watt)
Buy for €65.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 402 minutes ago
INTEL Core i3-6300 3,8GHz LGA1151 4MB Cache Tray CPU
Buy for €119.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 402 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-3470S
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Core i3-6300
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3470S | vs | Intel Core i3-6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
