Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2650 v3 outperforms Core i5-3437U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2650 v3 is 615 days newer than Core i5-3437U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3437U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 17 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Performs up to 6% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3437U - 122 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3437U - 20 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-3437U
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3437U | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
