Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms Core i5-3427U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 3443 days newer than Core i5-3427U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3427U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 17 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 21% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-3427U - 186 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3427U - 24 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
186
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€426.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €426.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3427U | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |